Vacaero

Manufacturers of heat treating and brazing vacuum furnaces and controls, complete hot zone and vacuum furnace retrofits, thermal spray coatings, plasma, HVOF and paint coating services.

VAC AERO Service Experience Trust
Canada FrançaisAccessibility |

Archives for May 2014

Martensite and the Control of Retained Austenite

by

Formation of martensite in fine-grained steels is probably the most common goal in heat treatment of components. The carbon content of the parent austenite phase determines whether lath (low-carbon) or plate (high-carbon) martensite, or mixtures of the two will be produced, assuming the quench rate and steel hardenability are adequate for full hardening. Lath martensite produces higher toughness and ductility, but lower strengths, while plate martensite produces much higher strength, but may be rather brittle and non-ductile.

For a given alloy content, as the carbon content of the austenite increases, the martensite start, Ms, temperature and the martensite finish, Mf, temperature will be depressed which results in incomplete conversion of austenite to martensite. When this happens retained austenite, which may be either extremely detrimental or desirable under certain conditions, is observed.  The amount of retained austenite present depends upon the amount of carbon that can be dissolved in the parent austenite phase and the magnitude of the suppression of the Ms and Mf temperatures. This paper examines the conditions under which austenite is retained and the problems associated with it presence, with detecting it and with measuring it.

When to Use a Partial Pressure in a Vacuum Furnace

by

When heat treating or brazing in vacuum, the vapour pressure of the constituents in the materials being processed can be a very important consideration. 

The vapour pressure of a material is that pressure exerted at a given temperature when a material is in equilibrium with its own vapour.  Vapour pressure is a function of both the material and the temperature.  Figure 1 shows the approximate vapour pressure curves for a variety of metals and compounds.  The area to the left of each curve represents the conditions of temperature and pressure under which the material exists as a solid.  The area to the right of each curve represents those conditions under which the material exists as a gas (or vapour). BY JEFF PRITCHARD

A Vacuum Heat Treater’s Library

by

Over the years, many people have asked if we could recommend good books on the subject of Vacuum Heat Treatment. The following list includes books that we have found particularly useful  with respect to the scientific and practical aspects of vacuum, heat treatment, metallurgy and material science. Enjoy..

As you can tell from the list, some books are classics which have stood the test of time, some are relative newcomers, but all share the common trait that they are used each and every day by those of us who work in the fields of vacuum, heat treatment and metallurgy. The readers are encouraged to offer suggestions as to their favorite and most useful texts.

Determining the Nodularity of Graphite in Ductile Iron Using ASTM E2567

by

ASTM Committee E-4 on Metallography began a program to develop a test method for rating the nodularity of graphite in ductile iron in 1986. The initial effort centered upon using the sphericity equation to assess the shape. However, an interlaboratory study showed that the perimeter measurement varied with the magnification used. A perimeter-free shape factor based on the maximum Feret’s diameter was determined to be magnification independent and reliable.

Additionally, two types of “convex perimeters” were proposed over the ensuing years, but they were demonstrated to be highly biased towards yielding high nodularity ratings regardless of the irregularity of the particle’s shape. The study reported here compared the use of the maximum Feret’s diameter in the shape equation to the mean Feret’s diameter, 100X vs. 200X, a minimum shape factor limit for a particle to be a nodule of 0.5 vs. 0.6, and calculation of an area-based vs. a number-based % nodularity.